Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Slowing Growth of the Mormon Church


By Jonathan David |

Spring General Conference marks another annual report of church statistics which confirm the speculation that Church growth has slowed in recent years. Although many sources such as the national census have reported that the number of self-reported "Mormons" is far less than the Church-reported membership statistics, it wasn't until recently when these claims were validated by a general authority.

Late last year, Church Historian Elder Marlin Jensen spoke to a group of faculty and students at Utah State University about the alarming rate at which members are leaving. "Maybe since Kirtland, we've never had a period of - I'll call it apostasy, like we're having now," he said, referencing the failure of an illegal church bank in 1837 in which many leaders and members left the church.

Heber Kimball, an apostle of the church at the time said, “there were not twenty persons on earth that would declare that Joseph Smith was a prophet of God” (No Man Knows My History, 203). Joseph Smith was exiled by his own followers and disbelief reached a point that even the three witnesses of the Book of Mormon, pledged their loyalty to a prophetess with a black stone following the scandal. Given the severity of this incident in church history, just how many people are leaving today?

The growth of wards is a much more reliable indicator of growth. When referencing a graph representing the trends, it becomes clear that church growth has been declining since 1980. What can't be seen on this graph however, is average ward size.





When I was a missionary in Korea, it was common to attend a ward with 30 other people in a large chapel. The ward records always indicated that the ward was sizable, sometimes reaching a couple hundred members. But on Sundays, the same 30 faces showed up. As missionaries, we had the job of tracking down these other "members." It was rare to find anyone on the seemingly endless list of names and addresses. Each transfer we'd report to the bishop the people who no longer lived at the address recorded and who's current place of residence was unknown which was at least 95% of them. And each transfer, the bishop would fail to send the message on to church headquarters so that the list could be updated. The result was that each new set of missionaries were handed the same endless list of ward "members" to find. I wonder how widespread this problem is.


My home ward in California used to be pretty large... with an average of 200 people in attendance each Sunday. Since I left home, they have since split a couple wards. The result was two wards that could easily fit into the smallish chapel rather than one that commonly overflowed into the cultural hall. When I was younger, I remember it being extremely common to have overflow seating. As time has gone by, however, it seems as if that is becoming less and less common. When taking these observations into account, it may very well be that growth in the number of wards could be fairly unreliable as well. But no matter how it is spun, the statistics are clear. Church growth is slowing.

With estimates of 5 million self-reported members, a mere .07% of the total world population, decline in membership doesn't speak well for an organization claiming to be the "one true Church." If Jensen is right and the prophets of the church "really do know and they really care," it is unlikely that changes will not be made to try and gain growth. But what is this decline in growth indicate, and what will it mean for the Church's future?

One opinion is that the world is simply becoming more wicked and hearts are hardened and earth's inhabitants are dead to the spirit of God. It is easier to point outward and say that "those" people are hard-hearted and "those" people are evil and "we" are the ones who love God and accept his message, but we should remember that "those people" represent the 99.93% of the world. We should also remember that there are still more Mormons today than any other time on earth. It would also be wise to note that there is more freedom, equality, knowledge, comfort, healthcare, and access to education now than at any other time in our history. Society has continued to evolve and grow more "good" over time. So perhaps there is room for another opinion.

Maybe this decline in growth indicates an internal problem. One that many cannot and will not accept. If this is the case, the fact that the leaders of the church are aware of the decline may prove to very positive for the future of the church. When these internal problems are resolved, more people will be attracted to the organization and it will yield an overall better church. The equation goes something like this:

Decline in Growth = Positive Change = Better Organization = Rise in Growth

There are many members who believe the Church does not change because it is true. However, a quick look at church history will demonstrate otherwise. Social pressures have a huge effect on the Church, especially when those pressures translate to decline in growth. The next five years of Church history will be interesting to watch, especially if Romney becomes the next president. But regardless of the outcome, change is in the future.

Loosing My Religion (Part 1)


Podcast #11 April 2012 General Conference Review and Discussion
Brig leads a group of Cor Invictus community members in a discussion and review of the recent procedings of the April 2012 General Conference of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.




Click here to download

Editorial Opinion -Time for same-sex LDS marriages
By brad carmack
First Published Apr 04 2012 01:01 am • The Salt Lake Tribune


"Hi, my name is Brad Carmack, calling on behalf of Protect Marriage Maine. Will you vote to maintain the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman?"

This was my phone pitch in October of 2009. Calling from Provo, I was a volunteer in the effort to persuade Maine voters to oppose same-sex marriage. The following month the Maine referendum prevailed by 53 percent to 47 percent. Victory!

Now it’s coming up on 2 1/2 years since my anti-same-sex marriage activism and I find myself on the opposite side of the fence. During my last year at Brigham Young University, I risked my diplomas (MPA and JD) by writing and openly distributing a book about same-sex marriage and homosexuality entitled Homosexuality: A Straight BYU Student’s Perspective.

As I wrote I discovered the science behind sexual orientation, the social arguments for and against same-sex marriage, and the heart-wrenching stories of gay Mormons. This experience, along with some soul-searching and prayer, eventually convinced me to support same-sex marriage.

Mormonism is unequivocally pro-family. So is same-sex marriage. This is the strongest reason Mormonism can abide gay marriage. To my surprise, I’ve learned that same-sex couples can and do make wonderful parents.

Homosexual orientation is about more than lust; it’s about companionship, emotional intimacy and romance. Just like heterosexual orientation. The gay couples I know experience the same troubles and joys as my opposite-sex friends. Same-sex couples (and their children) stand to gain from the mutual caretaking, community support, and stabilizing effects of marriage. Risky mixed-orientation marriages (such as a gay man and a straight woman) and lifelong celibacy threaten healthy marriage more than do monogamous same-sex partnerships.

I also discovered that there is room within LDS theology for embracing gay families. Yes, I know the church vigorously opposed same-sex marriage in Hawaii, Alaska and California. Yes, many cite the church’s "Family Proclamation" and the 2010 Church Handbook of Instructions as clear condemnation of all homosexual behavior. However, the church’s law of chastity has always been explicitly tied to legal marriage — in which case a monogamous, legally married LDS same-sex couple in Massachusetts is already abiding the law of chastity.

What about scripture? We have no record of Jesus condemning homosexuality during His ministry. The Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price are silent about same-sex relationships. As many scholars have persuasively argued, the five or so Bible verses frequently referenced do not condemn homosexual conduct per se.

The "Family Proclamation" is not doctrine (compare it to both Official Declarations, which were voted on by general church membership), and even if it were, it does not provide an applicable test for discerning one’s spiritual sex (witness intersex persons).

I believe this is the moral issue of my LDS generation. After all, it is my (mostly straight) generation that will become the parents of tomorrow’s gay and lesbian children. My peers and I are fiercely committed to building a world where a robust opportunity for a healthy marriage is not limited to our straight children.


I pray for the day when more Mormons come to see the value of same-sex relationships, and seek to match an institution to the reality of homosexual orientation that will yield the same personal and societal benefits that flow from matching heterosexual marriage to heterosexual orientation.

Jesus taught that the Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath (Mark 2:27). Can we make a Sabbath marriage that is made for mankind — gay/lesbian mankind?

As Latter-day Saints, I for one believe that we can. And I hope that we will.

Brad Carmack is an attorney and lives in Phoenix, where he is an active member of the LDS Church.

Original SLTribune Story



BYU’s Gay Mormon Panel a Huge Success, Overflow Crowds Turned Away
Overflow crowd of students and visitors standing outside of the auditorium. Photo courtesy of Christopher C. Smith.
On Wednesday night April 4th at Brigham Young University, a panel of three self-identified homosexual students and one bisexual student talked openly regarding their struggles with their sexuality and how they have coped with their same-gender attraction along with their Mormon faith. All four students were attending BYU and had committed to living Church standards and the BYU Honor Code.

On university fliers for the event, the forum was advertised as, “Everything you wanted to know about being gay at BYU but were too afraid to ask.”

Held in an upstairs auditorium of the Martin Building (MARB), the university-sanctioned panel-discussion for gay, lesbian, and bisexual BYU students was met with perhaps more success than its organizers anticipated. The seating was full to capacity a half-hour before the event was scheduled to begin. More students, professors, and visitors found spots to sit on the floor or stand against the wall. The event was officially for BYU students only, and several visitors were turned away. BYU police were maintaining security at the forum.

Reactions



Reactions after the event were overwhelmingly positive. When the panel was finished, those in attendance gave the speakers a standing ovation. One student who attended told me,
“These four students [in the panel] have some of the strongest testimonies and wonderful relationships with Christ. … I hope that those who are struggling with same-gender attraction may see these four strong individuals and realize that they don’t have to choose between being honest about themselves and who they are and in being a member of the Church.”


One non-Mormon visitor who was not able to find seating at the event said that though disappointed he couldn’t personally hear the panel, he thought it was ”nice to see so much interest in the subject” at Mormon-dominated BYU.

A few minor reactions were less positive. According to some there were at least three attendees at the forum from a group called the “Standard of Liberty,” an organization composed of Latter-day Saints based in Pleasant Grove, Utah, who had been attacking the planned event earlier in the week. The Standard of Liberty had sent out an e-mail claiming the BYU forum on homosexuality would aid in destroying traditional values and would violate the BYU Honor Code. Stephen Graham, the group’s president, wrote,
“[The BYU forum] will be harmful, harmful to the souls of those giving the talks, harmful to those young minds listening who will be supported in covering both inward and outward sins and initiated further into homosexuality, and harmful to all those these people come in contact with.”


Others dismissed the “Standard of Liberty” group as being outside of mainstream Mormonism.

Read Full Salt Lake Tribune Story



"It Gets Better" at BYU




Mormons make Utah nation’s 2nd most religious state
By Donald W. Meyers | The Salt Lake Tribune
First Published Mar 28 2012

Poll » LDS influence becomes “hot-button” issue in many settings.
Robert Lane doesn’t need to see Gallup’s new poll to learn that Utah is one of the nation’s most religious states. He knows that by simply looking at Capitol Hill. "We have a de facto theocracy," said Lane, board president of the Humanists of Utah, "because most of the Legislature is LDS."

Gallup’s "State of the States" survey, released this week, ranks the Beehive State as the second-most religious state, behind Mississippi.

The poll, which has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 to 4 percentage points,
shows 57 percent of Utahns see themselves "very religious," compared with 59 percent of Mississippians.

In fact, Utah is the only Western state in the top 10; most are in the Deep South.

The poll defines that category as people who attend worship services at least weekly and make religion a part of their daily lives.

Despite Utah’s large number of "very religious" residents, a significant segment (28 percent) say they are "nonreligious," while 15 percent are "moderately religious."

Pam Perlich, senior research economist with the University of Utah’s Bureau of Economic Research, said the numbers reflect the dominance of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints in Utah. Read Full Salt Lake Tribune Story