Monday, February 9, 2015

Slovakia Dodges Anti-Gay Laws

by Brig Bagley

9 February 2015

Due to a poor voting turnout, Slovakia dodged an anti-gay law that would reinforce their current ban on SSM, prevent same-sex couples from adopting, and allow students to opt-out of classes that discuss sex. There was less than 50% registered voter turnout, a number required to put such legislation on the books. Although poor voter turnout is considered unfortunate, HRC exhales a sigh or relief.

Arizona based Alliance for Defending Freedom (ADF) is one of the largest-funded anti-LGBT groups that has connected with attorneys across the world to promote laws that dehumanize and invalidate gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgender persons. ADF wrote an amicus brief to Slovakia to encourage that this bill pass in the country.

Alabama Becomes #37



9 February 2015

Alabama's Governor Moore and Attorney General Strange are furious as the United States Supreme Court has denied their request to extend the stay for the federal ruling that a ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. Sunday night, Moore issued a demand that no licenses be issued, but several judges have already issued them in Alabama counties with officiators performing the marriages at parks.

Although there are a few judges siding with Moore and refusing the federal order, they will be subject to retribution for disobeying.

Alabama becomes the 37th state in the US to allow SSM to the celebration of many.

The greater news from this is that SCOTUS denied this request AFTER taking on the SSM issue. It would be completely unexpected for the High Court to reverse it's decisions at this point. A 50 State federal requirement to recognize same sex marriage is on the horizon.

Read more here: https://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=157&sid=33407573

http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/scotus-sez-thats-all-folks

Friday, February 6, 2015

"Freedom to Discriminate" Showing Up Across US



by Brig Bagley

6 February 2015

Several states have started drafting bills and laws with similar language: religions are under attack and should be protected from laws that force them to contradict their beliefs.

Jan Brewer of Arizona vetoed a law with this language about a year ago that passed through the state's senate floor. Urged by a coalition of groups and businesses, Gov. Brewer agreed that it would be bad for business and society to permit persons with religious convictions to deny services, products, and housing because their beliefs disagree with another's personal life.

Although laws that protect one's freedom to believe as they please, laws should not allow someone to refuse business association with another simply because of opposing beliefs.

Gov. Gary Herbert of Utah recently claimed that people are being fired for disagreeing with same-sex marriage. He did not reveal any specifics, but said that discrimination occurs on both sides of the issue, and that discrimination based on religion is also wrong.


True. Partially. The First Amendment guarantees that an individual has a freedom of speech and freedom of religion (also from religion). The government cannot force or support or promote any religious belief, or punish a citizen for expressing an opinion (with a few exceptions, such as "bomb" in a plane or "fire" in a theater). 

But freedom of speech and freedom of religion in the First Amendment DOES NOT allow someone to act in such a way that another is harmed or is denied a service or good. Practicing a religion does not mean a person can use religion to not do their job, sell a product, or provide shelter. You still can hold your beliefs. That is your right. But because someone else does not hold your belief, you cannot punish them. 

Freedom of speech is just that. Speech. Not action. Even religions are denied certain practices (human or animal sacrifice, as an example). And religions are also even denied ability to endorse political candidates (although that is never really enforced). 

Yes, a religious person is free to exclaim their hate and disagreement with gays and same-sex marriage. At work, home, school, whatever. You can say whatever you want. Don't expect to make may friends, though. But at the end of the day, you still have to bake that cake for them. Take their pictures. Let them rent your house. If they knew you didn't like them, they would probably not do business with you anyway. So tell them you don't approve of their life (although it's rude and unethical). But also tell them that you will serve them or rent to them anyway because they qualify just like any other. 

That is the difference. Your boss won't threaten or fire you for your beliefs or for being gay. But he should punish you for denying services or not doing your job because of your beliefs. If you're going to go out in the world, you're going to have to deal with people not like you. Religious or not. Think what you want. But do your job. Actions cannot be discriminatory. 



Sunday, February 1, 2015

An Outstanding Criticism of LDS Church's Plea for 'Religious Freedom'



by Brig Bagley

1 February 2015

A close friend of mine is exquisite in his arguments and explanations. Jonathan has had a blog for years on-and-off. Recently he has moved from SLC to Maryland, near D.C. and has been regular in his posts. His most recent post criticizes the LDS church's claim to persecution in the LGBT issue, and its call for more religious freedoms.

A few points I thought were meaningful:


  • Mr. Oaks mixed the word "abortion" with "artificial insemination of lesbians" to add a scare tactic to the situation. Since when do lesbians get accidentally pregnant, and when did abortion have to do with any of this?
  • The LDS church claims to be "bullied" in not conforming to granting equality to LGBT groups. But when did you last hear of a Mormon committing suicide because of the oppression of "the gays"? Or a Mormon feels life is unbearable because "the gays" are one step closer to receiving full equality under the law?
  • The "Good Samaritan" is an ironic example of how the LDS Church wishes to walk past the injured man on the side of the road "for religious reasons", just like the priest and the Levite. The man may be "unclean" or too "icky" to help, so the LDS church would like to have legal permission avoid providing its help and offering its services to the man (in this case, a gay man).

Idaho Kills LGBT Nondiscrimination bill 13-4

Idaho ‘Add the Words’ nondiscrimination bill dies in committee

by Brig Bagley

1 February 2015

A bill to simply add the works "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" to the Idaho "Human Rights Act" was killed by republican representatives in the vote.

Supporters of the bill wept in failure, knowing the fear that comes with being judged for their differences in school, work, and housing. Legislators stated that they believe the state has come a long way, and that these concerns are very legitimate. But the bill as written was not appropriate for passage.

Read more here: http://gaysaltlake.com/news/2015/01/29/idaho-add-words-nondiscrimination-bill-dies-committee/

HRC Calls LDS Support for LGBT Nondiscrimination / Religious Freedom "Flawed"

HRC calls Mormon appeal for religious freedoms legislation ‘flawed’

by Brig Bagley

1 February 2015

Although the HRC is glad that the LDS church is publicly, officially, and loudly voicing support for state-wide and even nation-wide nondiscrimination for LGBT, it says the the religious freedom exceptions make it deeply flawed.
"Doctors would still be allowed to deny medical care. Pharmacists would still be allowed to refuse to fill valid prescriptions. And landlords, as well as business operators, would still be allowed to reject LGBT people. All in the name of religion."

Jackie Biskupski Announces Candidacy for SLC Mayor, Stands for Equality



by Brig Bagley

1 February 2015

Jackie Biskupski, a lesbian and mother of one boy, has stood up to announce her plan to run for SLC mayor. The KSL article outlines her sexual orientation and platform of focusing on LGBT issues, but she also has plans to provide equal education across the city--not just giving certain zip codes better funding.  Air quality, gender equality, and a better environment for business are other issues on her plate.

Read more here: https://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=33311683